Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DZack23's avatar

Worth noting that for "order independent" transactions, the sequencer can still attempt to censor them via spamming the chain and raising the gas price before the hand-off. This will generally be much more for costly for the sequencer than the sorts of cases with state contention discussed in the article, but still.

The user submitting the transaction can anticipate and mitigate by setting a high max gas price bid. On the protocol level, mitigating this nudges towards a lower force-inclusion time window (some discussion here https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-decrease-censorship-delay-from-24-hours-to-4-hours/13047), but generally speaking, more research on this problem is needed IMO.

Expand full comment

No posts